Bradley Burston : Who Pays for Israel's Settlements? It Could Be You
-
WATCH: Meet Uri Blau, the journalist investigating U.S. donations to Israeli settlements
-
An inside look at how Haaretz tracked the flow of U.S. donations to Israeli settlements
In a country as tightly knit and
loquacious as Israel, it's long been axiomatic that even where state
secrets are concerned, everyone knows everything. The nuclear program,
military deployments, air strikes on a Syrian reactor, cyber wars,
Mossad hit teams - you name it, to a one, they've become
schoolyard-level public knowledge.
With one exception.
Through
it all, only one highly classified framework has managed to maintain an
ironclad barrier of secrecy: settlement funding. Come what may, the
artfully camouflaged money trail that leads to Israeli enclaves West Bank and East Jerusalem, remains largely a black hole.
Who, then, pays for the settlements? It turns out that if you live in Israel - or for that matter, the United States - it could be you. Like it or not.
Only
recently have concerted efforts on a number of fronts begun to shed
light on the many ways the funds are raised and delivered, often taking
advantage of laws and statutes meant for very different goals.
In the Knesset, Finance Committee firebrand MK Stav Shaffir (Zionist Union), has taken on the Great White Whale of under-the-radar funding and land-transfer shenanigans, the World Zionist Organization's monumentally shady Settlement Division.
In the Knesset, Finance Committee firebrand MK Stav Shaffir (Zionist Union), has taken on the Great White Whale of under-the-radar funding and land-transfer shenanigans, the World Zionist Organization's monumentally shady Settlement Division.
The battle for transparency in the WZO waged by a range of activists in Israel has been taken up by an alliance of
anti-occupation, pro-Israel groups abroad, among them Ameinu, J Street,
the New Israel Fund, Americans for Peace Now, Open Hillel, Habonim
Dror, Hashomer Hatzair, and Partners for Progressive Israel. The Rabbis
for Human Rights / T'ruah organizations and others have challenged the
Jewish National Fund to come clean on its operations over the 1967 Green
Line border.
Yet the drive for transparency remains a steeply uphill battle, still in its initial stages.
"I'm a member of the (Knesset) Finance Committee, and I'm telling you, I'm being conned," remarked then-coalition
MK Elazar Stern last year. "Funds are hidden. Clauses are lumped
together so that you vote on an item that is justified and then they
slip it in."
Over
time, funneling monies to settlements has become the most successful
sustained smuggling operation in Israel's history. The ability to hide
the truth has become something of a point of pride, even at the highest
levels of government.
As
then-finance minister Yuval Steinitz remarked thee years ago in an
interview with a radio station with a large settler listenership: "We've
doubled the budget for Judea and Samaria [the West Bank]. We did this
in a low-profile manner, because we didn't want parties either in Israel
or abroad to thwart the move."
Where
private donations, budgetary sleight of hand, and government revenues
are concerned, anything is fair game, potential gain, for the settlement
project.
It is in this context that a current series of articles by Haaretz investigative journalist Uri Blau assumes particular importance. The investigation probes a little-known conduit of funding for settlements,
in which private American donors can contribute to settlements and gain
a tax deduction, despite longstanding official U.S. opposition to the
settlement movement.
The
result? More than $220 million dollars in private U.S. contributions to
West Bank settlements in 2009-2013 alone, effectively facilitated by an
American government on record as viewing the enclaves as a primary
obstacle to a potential future accord.
Other,
non-settlement-directed donations by Americans to such organizations as
the Jewish National Fund, may also be used to help foster the settlement
enterprise. No one, as yet, really knows for sure, because the JNF,
like the WZO, was so long and so successfully shielded from public
oversight.
Are
the tax exemptions - and the consequent tacit encouragement of
settlement growth - likely to continue? A number of factors may
determine the answer. The deciding vote may be cast by the American
electorate, a body whose increasing polarization is keenly felt on
Israel-Palestine issues.
Polls
have shown that the Evangelicals who wield telling influence on the
Republican Party, are strong supporters of settlement growth. At the
same time, opposition to settlements as the symbol and the stronghold of
Benjamin Netanyahu's government, appears to be steadily building among
Democrats, especially among younger voters, who voice marked
disenchantment with Israel in general and the settlements in particular.
Time and
again, the Obama administration has pledged that it would not allow its
displeasure over barbs by Israeli leaders to adversely affect U.S.
foreign aid for Israel's security needs.
Nonetheless,
years of fiercely anti-Obama, unashamedly pro-Republican declarations
by Netanyahu coalition figures may yet take their toll. The
characterizations of President Obama as being proto-Islamist in outlook
and anti-Israel at heart, may one day translate into a shift in U.S.
policy. If there is to be a change, a re-evaluation of Internal Revenue
Service policy on tax-deductible private donations to settlements, could
be a logical place to start.
It's a
deep well, that American fount of fellowship with Israel, but spit in it
long enough, and someone's just liable to spit back.
Commenti
Posta un commento